Date: 2010-03-26 03:53 am (UTC)
jld: (Default)
From: [personal profile] jld
The analogy to car insurance was used a lot.

But, as various people have pointed out, it doesn't quite work, in that there's a difference between being alive (condition of health insurance mandate) and choosing to own a multiton hunk of metal and hurl it around at high speed near innocent people (condition of car insurance mandate).

put the onus on employers to offer affordable coverage

Just this, without anything else, still leaves people SOL when they lose their jobs, and likely SOL when changing jobs given the pre-existing condition racket. Which is a problem in itself, but I'm also reminded of one of the things the supporters of the health care bill claimed: that having insurance decoupled from jobs would make people freer to change jobs (or try going into business for themselves, small businesses being the lifeblood &c.), and thus increase economic efficiency. I don't know if it'll actually work like that or not (well, I mean, no-one knows for sure yet), but it seemed like an interesting angle.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

Red with Blue Stripes

February 2011

S M T W T F S
  123 45
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728     

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags