Hmm. One thing I'm curious about is, if the SC is asked to (essentially) revive that part of the 14th, could it at the same time consider reviving (or applying, depending on whether you consider it's still alive) the 10th? Esp. the part of it about states' powers? (Or did that part play out in state courts already?)
(Also, why is the NRA a respondent, when its counsel appears to argue in support off petitioner?I'm confused.)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Re: about the law details
Date: 2010-03-09 05:13 pm (UTC)(Also, why is the NRA a respondent, when its counsel appears to argue in support off petitioner?I'm confused.)