Do you feel that the P&I approach he's taken is bad enough to damage the case? Or is it just going to be a little harder? Or is that not really how this sort of thing works?
Honestly, usually the SC takes each argument separately. But obviously that depends on the strength of the rest of his arguments and if he himself can juggle all of them. So... is he a good lawyer? I haven't any clue.
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Re: about the law details
Date: 2010-03-09 05:36 pm (UTC)Honestly, usually the SC takes each argument separately. But obviously that depends on the strength of the rest of his arguments and if he himself can juggle all of them. So... is he a good lawyer? I haven't any clue.